The Impact of Technical Non-Tariff Measures on Pakistan's Export Performance

Authors

  • Muhammad Jamal Hussain Business School, Hohai University, Jiangning, Nanjing
  • Faseeha Fatima Department of Agriculture and Resource Economics, University of Agriculture Faisalabad
  • Attaullah Veesar Department of Agricultural Economics, FASS. Sindh Agriculture University Tandojam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59890/ijefbs.v3i5.176

Keywords:

Pakistan, Technical Barriers to Trade, Sanitary and Phytosanitary, Exports, WTO, Frequency Index, the Coverage Ratio

Abstract

Technical non-tariff barriers, such as sanitary and phytosanitary regulations and technical trade barriers (TBTs), must be scrupulously adhered to by WTO members (SPSs). The protection of food, people, animals, plants, and the environment is the goal of these NTBs. The only way for nations to compete on the global market is by adhering to WTO standards for products and quality. International commerce has been both helped and hampered by non-tariff obstacles. Any country's exports depend on the successful implementation of both microeconomic and macroeconomic policies because of the interaction between product supply and demand. In a developing global and local economy, this article analyses economic methods that promote commerce and rethink routes to riches. The United States, China, and the United Arab Emirates top Pakistan's export partners all enacted and upheld TBT and SPS standards between 2003 and 2016. This study looked at the effects of these policies at the HS-2 product code level. TBT and SPS measurements are computed using, respectively, a ratio of coverage and an index of frequency. This Research is based on Secondary data, data has been taken from different sources like research articles, Websites like World Bank, SBP, UNCTD etc. Through Secondary qualitative analysis, all data and their results have been analysed deeply and provide conclusions. The study findings showed Pakistan's export performance, which has been boosted by the importer's TBT on Pakistani goods, has been badly hurt by SPS. The paper also looks at how these NTBs affect the business and agricultural sectors separately. TBT and SPS use the frequency index and the export coverage ratio to measure rising agricultural and industrial exports. The data set contains information from WDI, WTO, and UN Comtrade.

References

Altaf, S., Mahmood, Z., & Noureen, S. (2020). Trade costs of Pakistan with its major trading partners: Measurement and its determinants.

Anderson, J. E., & Van Wincoop, E. (2004). Trade costs. Journal of Economic Literature, 42(3), 691-751.

Ardakani, Z., Yazdani, S., & Gilanpour, O. (2009). Studying the effects of non-tariff barriers on the export of the main agricultural products of Iran. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 6(7), 1321-1326.

Bao, X., & Qiu, L. D. (2010). Do technical trade barriers promote or restrict trade? Evidence from China. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, 17(3), 253-278.

Beghin, J. C., & Bureau, J.-C. (2001). Quantification of sanitary, phytosanitary, and technical barriers to trade for trade policy analysis.

Besedina, E. (2015). Technical barriers to trade and SPS measures, and export dynamics. Norwegian Institute of International Affairs.

Bora, B., Kuwahara, A., & Laird, S. (2002). Quantification of non-tariff measures, policy issues in international trade, and commodities. UNCTAD Study Series 18.

Chaney, T. (2008). Distorted gravity: The intensive and extensive margins of international trade. American Economic Review, 98(4), 1707-1721.

Ferrantino, M. J. (2006). Quantifying the trade and economic effects of non-tariff measures.

Helpman, E., Melitz, M., & Rubinstein, Y. (2008). Estimating trade flows: Trading volumes. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123, 441-487.

Irshad, M. S., Xin, Q., Hao, H., & Arshad, H. (2017). SWOT analysis of Pakistan-China Free Trade Agreement: Pros and cons. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 7(1).

Johnston, J., & DiNardo, J. (2001). Econometric methods (4th ed.).

Korinek, J., Melatos, M., & Rau, M.-L. (2008). A review of methods for quantifying the trade effects of standards in the agri-food sector. OECD Trade Policy Working Papers.

Krugman, P. (1980). Scale economies, product differentiation, and the pattern of trade. American Economic Review, 70(5), 951-960.

Ministry of Commerce, Pakistan. (2016). Strategic trade policy framework 2015-18.

Ministry of Finance. (2017). Pakistan Economic Survey 2015-2016.

Novy-Marx, R. (2013). The other side of value: The gross profitability premium. Journal of Financial Economics, 108(1), 1-28.

Shah, S., Sajid, A., & Ali, S. (2014). The impact of technical barriers to trade on Pakistan’s textile industry. Pakistan Journal of Science, 66(2).

Sithamparam, A. G., & Devadason, E. S. (2011). Do non-tariff measures in the EU, Japan, and ASEAN matter for export consignments from Malaysia? SSRN.

Tinbergen, J. (1962). Shaping the world economy: Suggestions for an international economic policy. The Economic Journal, 76(301), 92-95.

UNCTAD. (2012). International classification of non-tariff measures, version 2012.

Walter, I. (1971). Nontariff barriers and the export performance of developing economies. The American Economic Review, 61(12), 195-205.

World Trade Organization. (2012). The trade effects of non-tariff measures.

WTO. (2017). Integrated trade intelligence portal (I-TIP): Improving the transparency of trade policy measures.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-22