Beyond Iconography: Interpreting the Mapag Toya as an Embodied Visual Communication System in Balinese Cultural Ecology

Authors

  • Maria Josef Retno Budi Wahyuni Telkom University, Faculty of Creative Industries

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59890/ijsas.v4i2.356

Keywords:

Mapag Toya, visual communication, iconography, semiotics, ritual studies, cultural ecology, Balinese Hinduism

Abstract

Ritual practices in Balinese Hindu culture constitute complex systems of meaning that integrate visual, spatial, and symbolic communication. This study examines the Mapag Toya ceremony at Pura Luhur Batukaru as a form of visual communication embedded within a socio-cultural and ecological framework. While previous studies have predominantly approached ritual through descriptive cultural analysis, this research advances a multilayered interpretive framework combining iconographic analysis, semiotic interpretation, and ritual anthropology. Using qualitative methods, data were collected through field observation, interviews with ritual actors, and documentation of ceremonial processes. The analysis applies three levels of interpretation—visual description, symbolic identification, and intrinsic meaning—while extending beyond classical iconography to examine how meaning is constructed, communicated, and embodied through ritual performance. The findings demonstrate that Mapag Toya operates not merely as a religious ceremony but as an integrated visual communication system that articulates relationships between humans, nature, and the divine, as conceptualised in the Tri Hita Karana philosophy. The ritual encodes ecological knowledge, social organisation, and spiritual values through symbolic forms, spatial arrangements, and performative actions. This study contributes to design and cultural research by reframing ritual as an active communicative medium rather than a static symbolic representation, offering a methodological integration that bridges visual studies, anthropology, and cultural ecology.

References

Arsana, I. N., Juliasih, N. K. A., Sudiartawan, I. P., Suardana, A. a. K., Sumarya, I. M., & Widyantari, A. S. S. (2025). SUBAK: Traditional ecological knowledge for sustainable biodiversity conservation. IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science, 1438(1), 012005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1438/1/012005

Baker, M. (2021). Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design, 3rd ed., by Gunter Kress and Theo van Leeuwen. Visual Communication Quarterly, 28(4), 253–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/15551393.2021.1992242

Barthes, R., & Heath, S. (1977). Image-Music-Text. In Medical Entomology and Zoology. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BA10872380

Bateman, J., Wildfeuer, J., & Hiippala, T. (2018). Multimodality. Foundations, research and analysis. A problem-oriented introduction. Romanistisches Jahrbuch, 69(1), 227–231. https://doi.org/10.1515/roja-2018-0009

Bell, C. (2009). Ritual:Perspectives and Dimensions—Revised Edition: Perspectives and Dimensions—Revised Edition. Oxford University Press, USA.

Bell, C. (2010). Ritual theory, ritual practice. OUP USA.

Brandellero, A., & Janssen, S. (2013). Popular music as cultural heritage: scoping out the field of practice. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 20(3), 224–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2013.779294

Fenn, R., & Geertz, C. (1974). The interpretation of cultures. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 13(2), 248. https://doi.org/10.2307/1384392

Gardner, P. M., & Turner, V. W. (1971). The ritual process: Structure and Anti-Structure. Journal of American Folklore, 84(334), 450. https://doi.org/10.2307/539642

Haniifa, R., & Palimirmo, R. (2025). From anthropocentrism to ecocentrism: The role of local wisdom and religious tradition in transforming environmental ethics. Holistic Journal of Tropical Agriculture Sciences, 3(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.61511/hjtas.v3i1.2025.1234

Harrison, R. (2012). Heritage: Critical approaches. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203108857

Huang, H. (2019). Nature and the spirit: ritual, environment, and the Subak in Bali. EnviroLab Asia, 3(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.5642/envirolabasia.20190302.01

Ingold, T. (2011). Being alive essays on movement, knowledge and description. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003196679

Ingold, T. (2013). Making: Anthropology, Archaeology, Art and Architecture.

Jewitt, C. (2013). Multimodal methods for researching digital technologies. In THE SAGE HANDBOOK OF DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH (pp. 250–265). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446282229.n18

Julianto, I. N. L., Jodog, M., & Santoso, I. (2016). Nilai Interaksi Simbol Tradisi dalam Wujud Pelinggih pada Ruang Publik. Panggung, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.26742/panggung.v26i1.159

Kamala, N. M. L. S., & Salim, T. A. (2025). Information dissemination of subak culture as a knowledge preservation effort in Museum Subak Bali. Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan Dan Informasi, 21(2), 391–406. https://doi.org/10.22146/bip.v21i2.15058

Lansing, J. S. (2006). Perfect Order: Recognizing complexity in Bali. In Princeton University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400845866

Lansing, J. S., & Fox, K. M. (2011). Niche construction on Bali: the gods of the countryside. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, 366(1566), 927–934. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0308

Lestari, P. F. K., Sukanteri, N. P. S., & Amaral, N. P. a. A. (2021). The FARMERS PARTICIPATION IN AGRO-TOURISM DEVELOPMENT IN SUBAK JATILUWIH, PENEBEL DISTRICT, TABANAN REGENCY. SEAS (Sustainable Environment Agricultural Science), 5(2), 96–104. https://doi.org/10.22225/seas.5.2.3967.96-104

Orlove, B., & Caton, S. C. (2010). Water Sustainability: Anthropological Approaches and Prospects. Annual Review of Anthropology, 39(1), 401–415. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.012809.105045

Panofsky, E. (1955). “Iconography and Iconology: An Introduction to the Study of Renaissance art.” in Meaning in the Visual Arts: Papers in and on Art History. In Meaning in the Visual Arts: Papers in and on Art History (pp. 26–54). Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

Pink, S. (2015). Doing sensory ethnography. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473917057

Putra, A. P. D. (2026). Sakralitas Digital Hindu Bali Translokasi Ruang Suci ke Media Sosial. Jurnal Penelitian Agama Hindu, 10(1), 58–68. https://doi.org/10.37329/jpah.v10i1.4481

Schechner, R. (2013). PERFORMANCE STUDIES: An Introduction (3rd ed.). Routledge.

Smith, L. (2006). Uses of heritage. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203602263

Smith, L., & Waterton, E. (2009). Heritage, Communities and Archaeology.

Suastini, N. N. (2021). Upacara Biyukukung (Kearifan Lokal Masyarakat Bali dalam Menjaga Teo-Agrikultur). Widya Duta Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Agama Dan Ilmu Sosial Budaya, 16(2), 174. https://doi.org/10.25078/wd.v16i2.2887

Suparwa, I. N., Candrawati, N. L. K., Sari, N. M. D. P., & Putra, A. a. P. (2023). Representation of Dewi Sri in Balinese farming ceremonies. International Journal of Linguistics Literature and Culture, 9(4), 132–144. https://doi.org/10.21744/ijllc.v9n4.2315

Wahyuni, M., Santosa, I., Irfansyah, & Julianto, I. N. L. (2023). The concept of water exaltation in the Subak. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(2), e345. https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i2.345

Waterton, E., & Watson, S. P. (2010). Heritage and community engagement: collaboration or contestation? Special Issue: International Journal of Heritage Studies, 16, 1–12.

Winter, T. (2014). Heritage conservation futures in an age of shifting global power. Journal of Social Archaeology, 14(3), 319–339. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469605314532749

Published

2026-04-09