Examining the Origins of Double-Entry Bookkeeping, Memorandums, Journals, and Ledgers as the Foundation of Modern Accounting: A Literature Review

Authors

  • Masdar Ryketeng Makassar State University
  • Samsinar Makassar State University
  • Hariany Idris Makassar State University
  • Anni Suryani STIE AMKOP Makassar
  • Atia Kirana STIE AMKOP Makassar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59890/ijsr.v4i3.470

Keywords:

Double-Entry Bookkeeping, Memorandum, Journal, Ledger, Accounting Historiography, Accounting History, Literature Review

Abstract

This study examines the emergence of double-entry bookkeeping, memoranda, journals, and ledgers as the foundations of modern accounting from an accounting historiography perspective. Using a qualitative approach, the research employs a non-systematic literature review (non-SLR) of 26 national and international journal articles, supported by primary historical sources on accounting record systems. Data were analyzed through identification, classification, literature synthesis, and thematic analysis. The findings show that double-entry bookkeeping evolved gradually from medieval Italian trade through the development of memoranda, journals, and ledgers as tools for transaction recording, economic control, and trade documentation. This evolution was driven not only by commercial and technical needs but also by social, cultural, political, legal, and economic factors. The study also identifies a historical continuity between traditional ledger systems and contemporary accounting developments, including blockchain-based distributed ledger technology. It concludes that memoranda, journals, and ledgers form part of the multidimensional evolution of accounting knowledge that has shaped accounting practices from the medieval period to the modern digital era.

References

Bánociová, A., & Pavliková, Ľ. (2014). Accounting Plan – Information Base for Management. Procedia Economics and Finance, 15, 312–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2212-5671(14)00513-9

Carnegie, G. D., Mcbride, K. M., Napier, C. J., Holloway, R., & Parker, L. D. (2020). Accounting history and theorising about organisations ACCOUNTING HISTORY AND THEORISING ABOUT ORGANISATIONS ACCOUNTING HISTORY AND THEORISING ABOUT ORGANISATIONS. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2020.100932

Edwards, J. R. (2014). The method of bookkeeping, deduced from clear principles. Accounting and Business Research, 45(2), 256–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2014.978255

Gilbert, C., Everett, J., & de Castro Casa Nova, S. P. (2024). Patriarchy, capitalism, and accounting: A herstory. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2024.102733

Gurskaya, M. (2025). development of double-entry bookkeeping in the 13th-15th centuries. De Computis, Revista Española de Historia de La Contabilidad., 22(1), 179–182. https://doi.org/10.26784/issn.1886-1881.22.1.12202

Hopwood, A. G. (1987). THE ARCHAEOLOGY OF ACCOUNTING SYSTEMS*. In Accounting Organizations and Society (Vol. 12, Number 3).

Izoulet, M. (2021). The Invention of Double-Entry Bookkeeping. International Journal of Management Research and Economics, 1(4), 48. https://doi.org/10.51483/ijmre.1.4.2021.48-60

Kieso, D. E. ., Weygandt, J. J. ., & Warfield, T. D. . (2020). Intermediate Accounting IFRS. John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated.

Kokaze, N., Fushimi, T., & Nakamura, Y. (2025). Contabilizar el comercio imperial: analysis of early double-entry accounting books with TEI/DEPCHA. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 40(Supplement_1), i39–i45. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqae032

Maiti, M., Kotliarov, I., & Lipatnikov, V. (2021). A future triple entry accounting framework using blockchain technology. Blockchain: Research and Applications, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcra.2021.100037

Matringe, N., & Power, M. (2024). Memories lost: A history of accounting records as forms of projection. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2023.101514

Mattessich, R. (2003). A CONCISE HISTORY OF ANALYTICAL ACCOUNTING: EXAMINING THE USE OF MATHEMATICAL NOTIONS IN OUR DISCIPLINE 1.

Ogie Dewandaru, R., Fatchan, I. N., Kharismasyah, A. Y., Aryoko, Y. P., & Anggara, A. A. (2025). Рэфлексія аб гістарыяграфіі бухгалтарскага ўліку: ад падвойнага запісу да этыкі, кансерватызму і ўстойлівасці. Zhurnal Belorusskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Istoriya, 7(3), 44–59.

Pacioli, Luca., & Cripps, Jeremy. (1994). Particularis de computis et scripturis, 1494 : a contemporary interpretation. Pacioli Society.

Sangster, A. (2025). The emergence of double entry bookkeeping. Economic History Review, 78(2), 499–528. https://doi.org/10.1111/ehr.13358

Urip Wardoyo, D., Taris Citra Rahadiansyah, D., Anggraeni Rahmadiah, D., & Audia Putri, S. (2021). MENGENALI PERSPEKTIF HISTORIS DAN MODERN ACCOUNTING. In Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Ekonomi (Number 8). http://ejournal.unikama.ac.idHal|95

Vollmer, H. (2024). Accounting and the shifting spheres: The economic, the public, the planet. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2024.101574

YAĞCI, Ç., & ERSERİM, A. (2022). DÜNYA-SİSTEMLERİ ANALİZİ BAĞLAMINDA OSMANLI MUHASEBE TARİHİNE HEREKE FABRİKASI ÜZERİNDEN BİR BAKIŞ. Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi, 24(MODAVICA Özel Sayısı), 228–255. https://doi.org/10.31460/mbdd.1066026

Published

2026-06-06

How to Cite

Masdar Ryketeng, Samsinar, Hariany Idris, Anni Suryani, & Atia Kirana. (2026). Examining the Origins of Double-Entry Bookkeeping, Memorandums, Journals, and Ledgers as the Foundation of Modern Accounting: A Literature Review. International Journal of Sustainability in Research, 4(3), 203–222. https://doi.org/10.59890/ijsr.v4i3.470

Issue

Section

Articles